Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Computing > Arch > Latest Posts
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic

Latest 200 Posts:
Post TitlePost byDate
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 29, 2008 at 05:39 PM
ONLINE RESOURCE FOR HELP DESK SOFTWAREnancygroup7@[EMAIL P...Aug 29, 2008 at 02:58 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 29, 2008 at 08:50 PM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cacheMitchAlsup <Mitch...Aug 29, 2008 at 01:25 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu..."Wilco Dijkstra...Aug 29, 2008 at 08:32 PM
Re: after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?MitchAlsup <Mitch...Aug 29, 2008 at 12:32 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 29, 2008 at 05:25 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu..."Wilco Dijkstra...Aug 29, 2008 at 06:01 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...already5chosen@[EMAI...Aug 29, 2008 at 06:41 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 29, 2008 at 06:12 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 29, 2008 at 05:58 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 29, 2008 at 05:44 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...JosephKK <quiette...Aug 29, 2008 at 05:11 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...JosephKK <quiette...Aug 29, 2008 at 05:05 AM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cache"Chris M. Thoma...Aug 28, 2008 at 09:35 PM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cache"Chris M. Thoma...Aug 28, 2008 at 09:25 PM
after SIMD implementation, is it still a RISC?"girish.gulawan...Aug 29, 2008 at 08:43 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...krw <krw@[EMAIL P...Aug 28, 2008 at 07:03 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...krw <krw@[EMAIL P...Aug 28, 2008 at 07:03 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...already5chosen@[EMAI...Aug 28, 2008 at 02:39 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Muzaffer Kal <kal...Aug 28, 2008 at 09:09 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...already5chosen@[EMAI...Aug 28, 2008 at 06:50 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 28, 2008 at 05:58 AM
Welcome to computer Architecturesellam <eramiapar...Aug 27, 2008 at 11:36 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Kim Enkovaara <ki...Aug 28, 2008 at 09:11 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 27, 2008 at 07:15 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Andrew Reilly <an...Aug 28, 2008 at 02:05 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Andrew Reilly <an...Aug 28, 2008 at 01:16 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...ArarghMail808NOSPAM@...Aug 27, 2008 at 07:08 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu..."Wilco Dijkstra...Aug 28, 2008 at 12:08 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Terje Mathisen <t...Aug 27, 2008 at 06:05 PM
Re: Future architecturesAnne & Lynn Whee...Aug 27, 2008 at 10:37 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 27, 2008 at 02:06 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 27, 2008 at 06:30 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 27, 2008 at 06:27 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 27, 2008 at 06:22 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 27, 2008 at 06:15 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 27, 2008 at 06:10 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu..."Wilco Dijkstra...Aug 27, 2008 at 10:17 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu..."Wilco Dijkstra...Aug 27, 2008 at 10:05 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 27, 2008 at 08:16 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 27, 2008 at 08:11 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...JosephKK <quiette...Aug 26, 2008 at 11:02 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...JosephKK <quiette...Aug 26, 2008 at 10:57 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...JosephKK <quiette...Aug 26, 2008 at 10:56 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...JosephKK <quiette...Aug 26, 2008 at 10:54 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...JosephKK <quiette...Aug 26, 2008 at 10:52 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Kim Enkovaara <ki...Aug 27, 2008 at 08:16 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 26, 2008 at 08:53 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 26, 2008 at 08:48 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...rpw3@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 26, 2008 at 09:59 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu..."Wilco Dijkstra...Aug 27, 2008 at 12:05 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu..."Wilco Dijkstra...Aug 26, 2008 at 11:56 PM
Re: Future architectures"Wilco Dijkstra...Aug 26, 2008 at 11:15 PM
Mark Robert Thorson LQQKING for ASS PlayGeorge Orwell <no...Aug 26, 2008 at 11:48 PM
The REVISED Mark Robert Thorson FAQKulin <remailer@[...Aug 26, 2008 at 09:42 PM
Re: triple word accumulatorAndreas Buschmann &l...Aug 25, 2008 at 06:26 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu..."Joel Koltner&q...Aug 26, 2008 at 11:48 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 26, 2008 at 06:25 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...glen herrmannsfeldt ...Aug 26, 2008 at 11:21 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...glen herrmannsfeldt ...Aug 26, 2008 at 11:19 AM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cacheMitchAlsup <Mitch...Aug 26, 2008 at 09:42 AM
CFP: Special Issue of ACM SIGOPS OSRMohamed Zahran <m...Aug 26, 2008 at 09:23 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 26, 2008 at 01:49 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 26, 2008 at 06:38 AM
Re: Future architecturestorbenm@[EMAIL PROTE...Aug 26, 2008 at 02:57 PM
gears.google.com for google' groups"girish.gulawan...Aug 26, 2008 at 06:07 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Terje Mathisen <t...Aug 26, 2008 at 02:08 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Terje Mathisen <t...Aug 26, 2008 at 01:51 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 26, 2008 at 07:18 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...JosephKK <quiette...Aug 25, 2008 at 11:03 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu..."Wilco Dijkstra...Aug 25, 2008 at 11:23 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 25, 2008 at 08:39 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu..."Wilco Dijkstra...Aug 25, 2008 at 09:34 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu..."Wilco Dijkstra...Aug 25, 2008 at 08:54 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Terje Mathisen <t...Aug 25, 2008 at 09:41 PM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cacheTerje Mathisen <t...Aug 25, 2008 at 09:39 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Terje Mathisen <t...Aug 25, 2008 at 09:31 PM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cachenmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 25, 2008 at 06:39 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 25, 2008 at 06:32 PM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cacheMitchAlsup <Mitch...Aug 25, 2008 at 11:23 AM
Re: Intel details future Larrabee graphics chipChrisQ <blackhole...Aug 25, 2008 at 05:57 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Terje Mathisen <t...Aug 25, 2008 at 07:50 PM
Re: triple word accumulatorMitchAlsup <Mitch...Aug 25, 2008 at 10:50 AM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cacheAnne & Lynn Whee...Aug 25, 2008 at 01:30 PM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cachenmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 25, 2008 at 04:09 PM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cache"Piotr Wyderski...Aug 25, 2008 at 05:43 PM
Re: triple word accumulatorBernd Paysan <ber...Aug 25, 2008 at 05:21 PM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cachenmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 25, 2008 at 03:02 PM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cache"Piotr Wyderski...Aug 25, 2008 at 04:44 PM
Re: Future architecturesAnne & Lynn Whee...Aug 25, 2008 at 10:10 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 25, 2008 at 01:55 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 25, 2008 at 06:36 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu..."Wilco Dijkstra...Aug 25, 2008 at 02:34 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 25, 2008 at 06:31 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Terje Mathisen <t...Aug 25, 2008 at 03:08 PM
Re: Von Neumann and revisionists [Re: Future archi...already5chosen@[EMAI...Aug 25, 2008 at 06:08 AM
Re: Von Neumann and revisionists [Re: Future archi...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 25, 2008 at 01:05 PM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cachenmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 25, 2008 at 12:58 PM
Re: Von Neumann and revisionists [Re: Future archi...already5chosen@[EMAI...Aug 25, 2008 at 05:53 AM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cache"Piotr Wyderski...Aug 25, 2008 at 02:50 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Terje Mathisen <t...Aug 25, 2008 at 02:41 PM
Re: Von Neumann and revisionists [Re: Future archi...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 25, 2008 at 12:36 PM
Von Neumann and revisionists [Re: Future architect...already5chosen@[EMAI...Aug 25, 2008 at 05:01 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 25, 2008 at 11:28 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 25, 2008 at 11:09 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Terje Mathisen <t...Aug 25, 2008 at 01:00 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 25, 2008 at 11:03 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...already5chosen@[EMAI...Aug 25, 2008 at 04:01 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...already5chosen@[EMAI...Aug 25, 2008 at 03:48 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 25, 2008 at 10:32 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...rpw3@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 25, 2008 at 05:06 AM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cachenmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 25, 2008 at 08:55 AM
Re: Future architecturesRobert Baer <robe...Aug 24, 2008 at 11:17 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Terje Mathisen <t...Aug 25, 2008 at 07:54 AM
Re: Future architecturesTerje Mathisen <t...Aug 25, 2008 at 07:48 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Andrew Reilly <an...Aug 25, 2008 at 12:42 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu..."James Van Busk...Aug 24, 2008 at 05:28 PM
Re: triple word accumulatorMitchAlsup <Mitch...Aug 24, 2008 at 03:57 PM
Re: Hardware Gather/Scatter for Larrabee"christian.bau&...Aug 24, 2008 at 03:43 PM
Re: triple word accumulatorBernd Paysan <ber...Aug 24, 2008 at 09:46 PM
Re: Future architecturesmalc@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 24, 2008 at 10:55 PM
Re: Future architecturesDennis <dennis@[E...Aug 24, 2008 at 12:54 PM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cacheMitchAlsup <Mitch...Aug 24, 2008 at 10:21 AM
Re: triple word accumulatorMitchAlsup <Mitch...Aug 24, 2008 at 10:16 AM
Re: triple word accumulator"Wilco Dijkstra...Aug 24, 2008 at 04:51 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 24, 2008 at 03:08 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...JosephKK <quiette...Aug 24, 2008 at 07:52 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...JosephKK <quiette...Aug 24, 2008 at 07:40 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...JosephKK <quiette...Aug 24, 2008 at 07:34 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu..."Wilco Dijkstra...Aug 24, 2008 at 03:07 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 24, 2008 at 01:56 PM
Re: What to do when reseller goes out of bussiness..."Skybuck Flying...Aug 24, 2008 at 03:21 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 24, 2008 at 12:37 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu..."Wilco Dijkstra...Aug 24, 2008 at 01:25 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu..."Wilco Dijkstra...Aug 24, 2008 at 12:59 PM
triple word accumulatorAndreas Buschmann &l...Aug 23, 2008 at 07:34 PM
Re: Future architecturesJoe Pfeiffer <pfe...Aug 23, 2008 at 11:27 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 23, 2008 at 05:13 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Andrew Reilly <an...Aug 24, 2008 at 12:06 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 23, 2008 at 04:49 PM
Re: Future architecturesmalc@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 24, 2008 at 02:23 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...ChrisQ <blackhole...Aug 23, 2008 at 10:22 PM
Re: Future architecturesBernd Paysan <ber...Aug 23, 2008 at 11:28 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Dennis <dennis@[E...Aug 23, 2008 at 03:16 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 23, 2008 at 07:12 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...ChrisQ <blackhole...Aug 23, 2008 at 06:53 PM
Re: Future architecturesChrisQ <blackhole...Aug 23, 2008 at 06:45 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Terje Mathisen <t...Aug 23, 2008 at 07:26 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Terje Mathisen <t...Aug 23, 2008 at 07:24 PM
Re: Future architecturesJoe Pfeiffer <pfe...Aug 23, 2008 at 11:04 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 23, 2008 at 07:55 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 23, 2008 at 07:52 AM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cachenmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 23, 2008 at 12:28 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 23, 2008 at 12:18 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 23, 2008 at 12:13 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu..."nedbrek" ...Aug 23, 2008 at 11:48 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...JosephKK <quiette...Aug 23, 2008 at 04:39 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...JosephKK <quiette...Aug 23, 2008 at 04:34 AM
Re: Some confusion about virtual cacheMitchAlsup <Mitch...Aug 22, 2008 at 12:33 PM
Re: BioStar Motherboard eaten my RAM ???!!"~misfit~"...Aug 22, 2008 at 07:44 PM
Some confusion about virtual cacheAbdullah Muzahid <...Aug 21, 2008 at 09:31 PM
Re: There is an Angle in my house ?!!! O:)Larry Elmore <lje...Aug 22, 2008 at 02:12 AM
Re: Intel details future Larrabee graphics chipalready5chosen@[EMAI...Aug 21, 2008 at 01:32 PM
home shop 18 - online computer hardware shoppatriberry <patri...Aug 21, 2008 at 05:51 AM
Re: Intel details future Larrabee graphics chipAnders.Montonen@[EMA...Aug 21, 2008 at 12:39 PM
Re: Intel details future Larrabee graphics chipAnimalMagic <Anim...Aug 20, 2008 at 11:50 PM
Re: Future architecturesJoe Pfeiffer <pfe...Aug 20, 2008 at 09:01 PM
Re: Intel details future Larrabee graphics chipMichel Hack <hack...Aug 20, 2008 at 01:57 PM
Re: Future architecturesAnne & Lynn Whee...Aug 20, 2008 at 09:15 AM
Re: Future architecturesnmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 20, 2008 at 08:33 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 20, 2008 at 08:25 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...Morten Reistad <f...Aug 20, 2008 at 10:09 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...torbenm@[EMAIL PROTE...Aug 20, 2008 at 09:39 AM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...MooseFET <kensmit...Aug 19, 2008 at 08:10 PM
Re: Future architecturesJoe Pfeiffer <pfe...Aug 19, 2008 at 07:53 PM
Future architectures [was Re: Intel details future...Andrew Reilly <an...Aug 20, 2008 at 01:01 AM
OSDI '08 Co-Located WorkshopsLionel Garth Jones &...Aug 19, 2008 at 03:56 PM
somewhat portable symbol table parsing facilities?Eliot Miranda <el...Aug 19, 2008 at 02:32 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 19, 2008 at 08:55 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...already5chosen@[EMAI...Aug 19, 2008 at 12:51 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 19, 2008 at 07:18 PM
Re: New Theory: Neighbours causing short circuits."Paul Hovnanian...Aug 19, 2008 at 12:12 PM
Re: Future architectures [was Re: Intel details fu...already5chosen@[EMAI...Aug 19, 2008 at 12:06 PM
Future architectures [was Re: Intel details future...nmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 19, 2008 at 04:35 PM
Re: Intel details future Larrabee graphics chipalready5chosen@[EMAI...Aug 19, 2008 at 08:32 AM
Re: I hate Call of Duty 4 and it's player and chea...Don Bowey <dbowey...Aug 19, 2008 at 08:17 AM
I hate Call of Duty 4 and it's player and cheaters..."Skybuck Flying...Aug 19, 2008 at 04:31 PM
Re: organic brain-based computers...jacko <jackokring...Aug 19, 2008 at 05:56 AM
Re: organic brain-based computers..."Chris M. Thoma...Aug 19, 2008 at 05:40 AM
Re: organic brain-based computers..."Chris M. Thoma...Aug 19, 2008 at 05:38 AM
Re: Intel details future Larrabee graphics chipnmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 19, 2008 at 12:26 PM
Training & Jobskiran <KiranUS200...Aug 19, 2008 at 05:22 AM
Re: Intel details future Larrabee graphics chipTerje Mathisen <t...Aug 19, 2008 at 01:48 PM
Re: Intel details future Larrabee graphics chipChrisQ <blackhole...Aug 19, 2008 at 11:43 AM
Re: Intel details future Larrabee graphics chipnmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 19, 2008 at 11:16 AM
Re: Intel details future Larrabee graphics chip"Wilco Dijkstra...Aug 19, 2008 at 12:08 PM
Re: There is an Angle in my house ?!!! O:)"Chris M. Thoma...Aug 19, 2008 at 04:05 AM
Re: Intel details future Larrabee graphics chipnmm1@[EMAIL PROTECTE...Aug 19, 2008 at 10:34 AM
Re: Intel details future Larrabee graphics chip"Chris M. Thoma...Aug 19, 2008 at 03:24 AM

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Aug 29 22:19:35 CDT 2008.