Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Computing > Computer Consultants > britain is prop...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 11 Topic 10000 of 10333
Post > Topic >>

britain is propsreous because india is poor

by "harmony" <aka@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 1, 2008 at 12:38 PM

britain is rich because of the huge loot of india which britian has not yet

returned. the right way to get rich is thr' cheap immigration labor.

Britain is world's 7th most stable and prosperous nation
The United Kingdom has been ranked as one of the most stable and
prosperous 
countries in the world, beating the United States, France and even 
Switzerland in a global *****sment of every nation's achievements and 
standards.

A one-year investigation and analysis of 235 countries and dependent 
territories has put the UK joint seventh in the premier league of nations.

The top ten comprise also the Vatican, Sweden, Luxembourg, Monaco, 
Gibraltar, San Marino, Liechtenstein, the Netherlands and the Irish 
Republic.

The US lies 22nd and Switzerland, normally associated with wealth and 
untouchable stability, is rated 17th, losing points in the *****sment of
its 
social achievements.

The bottom ten, surprisingly, do not include Iraq. They are listed as Gaza

and the West Bank, Somalia, Sudan, Afghanistan, Ivory Coast, Haiti, 
Zimbabwe, Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo and the Central African 
Republic.

The UK received high marks despite the deployment of combat troops in Iraq

and Afghanistan, the suicide bombings in London on July 7, 2005, the 
continuing threat from home-grown terrorists and the collapse of the 
Northern Rock bank.

The global check on every country recognised as an individual state or 
territory by the United Nations was carried out by Jane's Information
Group 
and is published today.

Christian Le Mière, managing editor of Jane's Country Risk, which compiled

the ratings, said: "The UK is a very stable country. But the top 20 or 30 
countries are all stable. There are terrorist groups in the UK but there
are 
effective security forces to deal with them. We took the July 7 bombings 
into account but the UK still came out very well."

He acknowledged that it was a little unfair to put the Vatican at the top 
because it did not face the sort of threats and economic pressures of
other 
countries. But under the rating system, which took into account each
nation's 
political structures, social and economic trends, military and security 
risks and external relations, the Vatican state scored an average of 99
out 
of 100. Sweden and Luxembourg were also rated 99, with the UK not far off,

with an average of 97, but scoring 100 for its politics, economics and 
external relations.

Mr Le Mière said that the US had fallen down the scale, although it still 
scored an average of 93 out of 100, partly because of the proliferation of

small arms owned by Americans and the threat to the population posed by
the 
flow of drugs from across the Mexican border.

He explained that Iraq had managed to escape the ignominy of being in the 
bottom ten because, despite "extremely high levels of violence", it had a 
"relatively stable Government" that controlled a significant area of the 
country and had good economic prospects. "Unlike Afghanistan, where - 
despite the presence of more than 40,000 foreign troops - the Government 
exercises poor control over large parts of the country and where 50 per
cent 
of the economy is dependent on the opium trade," he said.

Mr Le Mière gave warning of worrying trends in Africa where, he said,
there 
was likely to be a struggle for resources. He added that it was the first 
time that a rating system for countries had been carried out on such a
grand 
scale. The Jane's system differed from government *****sments of country 
risk because it was based entirely on objective analysis, "with no 
politicisation of the intelligence", he said.

Most stable:

Every country has been given a risk rating out of 100 for all-round 
stablilty

1. Vatican 99

2. Sweden 99

3. Luxembourg 99

4. Monaco 98

5. Gibraltar 98

6. San Marino 98

7. Liechtenstein 97

8. United Kingdom 97

9. The Netherlands 97

10. Irish Republic 97

US: 22nd equal 93

Most unstable:

Central African Republic 39

Democratic Congo 38

Chad 38

Zimbabwe 38

Haiti 38

Ivory Coast 36

Afghanistan 36

Sudan 35

Somalia 29

Gaza and West Bank 27

Iraq: 10th equal from bottom, with 44 points.

Source: Janes Information Services
 




 11 Posts in Topic:
britain is propsreous because india is poor
"harmony" <a  2008-07-01 12:38:05 
Re: britain is propsreous because india is poor
"theloneranger100@[E  2008-07-01 11:16:00 
Re: britain is propsreous because india is poor
habshi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-01 23:07:07 
Re: britain is propsreous because india is poor
"theloneranger100@[E  2008-07-02 06:51:19 
Re: britain is propsreous because india is poor
usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-01 23:26:16 
Re: britain is propsreous because india is poor
"harmony" <a  2008-07-02 13:07:29 
Re: britain is propsreous because india is poor
"harmony" <a  2008-07-14 14:33:36 
Re: britain is propsreous because india is poor
John Wetton <Asia@[EMA  2008-07-14 15:47:40 
Re: britain is propsreous because india is poor
Stray Dog <straydog200  2008-07-01 17:39:54 
Re: britain is propsreous because india is poor
"harmony" <a  2008-07-05 14:32:39 
Re: britain is propsreous because india is poor
"theloneranger100@[E  2008-07-02 11:21:57 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Sep 7 3:05:34 CDT 2008.